From Emory’s Gregory Berns here. Another argument for dog rights.
Author: jlolds
Private innovation….from the Economist
http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1
I’m an ethusiast of what Elon Musk is trying to do in Space and with Tesla. On a week when all the news seems grim here in Washington, here’s my version of good news…
Catch 22 on the debt ceiling….
Women in science–endangered species?
Eileen Pollack’s fine piece in today’s NYT magazine is here. I thank Avrama Blackwell for the link.
Ersatz peer review in fly-by-night journals….
John Bohannon’s science paper is here. This is a huge deal for science and for academic scholarship. As a journal editor myself (and my journal is over a century old), the value proposition that we offer is the quality of our peer review.
The government shutdown….
I haven’t written yet about this partly because, as a scientist, I’m so frustrated with the quite real effect on research, particularly at the NIH. But science has become truly global and, as a result, if its not done here in the States, it will get done elsewhere–although the results may then not accrue to advantage of the US.
I’m even more concerned about the debt ceiling issue. I’ve written about that issue before in the context of sequestration. I’ll simply reiterate that the brinksmanship is a very bad thing for the global economy.
Ultimately what I’m most worried about is the political dysfunction in governance at the federal level. This has manifested throughout the Obama Presidency in one form or another. Many others have written how the dysfunction we are seeing now is reminiscent of that seen before the American Civil War. That’s not a good precedent.
Family portrait-Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study
Two Cultures redux…
That’s CP Snow’s book, Two Cultures and its analysis of science versus the humanities. The lecture from which the book emerged took place in 1959. The battle still rages and the latest round can be found here. In the modern version its Steven Pinker versus Leon Wieseltier–enjoy!
Draft science bill–we aren’t going to like it….
There’s a bill being drafted by the House Science Committee and rumors are it’s going to be anathema to the science advocacy community, ScienceInsider has the story here. At stake may be peer review–both at NSF and other science agencies.
Stay tuned….
K-12 performance: more testing
From my college classmate Zeke Emanuel in The New Republic, here. Money quote:
Done properly, testing is not inert. Rather, it can be much more like the physical phenomena underlying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In the act of measuring students, you can actually affect how much knowledge they absorb and how well they retain it.
Zeke is raising a really important point. Learning outcomes are improved by the action of taking a test and getting the feedback of a grade. And increasing the frequency of testing actually improves those outcomes.
