David Brooks and Gail Collins on the future of the American Dream. I find myself agreeing with both of them. But without an economy that heavily leverages advances in science and technology, it’ll be very difficult for me to be at all optimistic about the future. So we not only need a creative class (think Richard Florida), we also need that creative class to be producing real products that offer solutions to our huge problems (think the intersection of climate and energy or health care).
Open letter to Congress from US Scientists
Can be found here.
These “multiple independent lines of evidence” are drawn from numerous public and private
research centers all across the United States and beyond, including several independent
analyses of surface temperature data. Even without including analyses from the UK research
center from which the emails were stolen, the body of evidence underlying our understanding
of human-caused global warming remains robust.
2011 Science Budgets
From Science Insider–they aren’t looking good.
The dangers of email revisited
I and many others have been following the so-called “Climate-gate” story out of the U.K. As has been well-described now, hackers broke into servers and released emails between respected climate change scientists which were, at the very least, embarrassing. This incident may have very far reaching consequences for policy, but is also a reminder of how potentially damaging electronic mail can be (at a professional and personal level).
Happy Thanksgiving to loyal readers
Here at our Wintergreen house, we’re listening to holiday tunes, baking bread and leisurely making our way through yesterday’s Financial Times. It’s time to say thank you to all of my readers, especially those who have contributed their own thoughts from time to time.
The Great Recession and Tuition at Public Universities
The New York Times has a running-debate here. Economist and colleague, Tyler Cowen and I have talked about this over lunch. At some point I’ll try to crystalize my ideas on the matter and put them into a blog post. In the meantime, let’s see if Tyler addresses the issue over at Marginal Revolution.
Our constrained brains
Hat Tip to Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish for this. Basically the notion that my colleague Tom Vogl has pushed for years: our brains’ architecture and physiology deeply constrain our complex behaviors (such as reading).
A busy week
I’ve been swamped this week with an ONR Workshop and the new Krasnow construction project. But have been keeping a close eye on interesting netsam floating over the Web-Ocean. I’m really pleased about the new NIH investment in behavioral sciences, OppNet–kudos to colleagues who have been working towards this goal for a very long time!
Big Blue’s Dharmendra Modha and Cat Neocortex simulation
Dharmendra’s team at IBM are making the news this morning. Here’s AP’s Jordan Robertson’s story.
A computer with the power of a human brain is not yet near. But this week researchers from IBM Corp. are reporting that they’ve simulated a cat’s cerebral cortex, the thinking part of the brain, using a massive supercomputer. The computer has 147,456 processors (most modern PCs have just one or two processors) and 144 terabytes of main memory — 100,000 times as much as your computer has.
Steve Pinker hits the Malcom Gladwell’s nail on the head
Here’s Steve Pinker’s spot-on review of Gladwell Inc. (the author of Blink and Outliers).