Research Update – Juan R. Cebral

I am an Associate Professor in the Computational and Data Sciences Department of the College of Sciences at GMU and the Center for Computational Fluid Dynamics. Recently, I have been invited by Jim to join Krasnow and to write a summary of our research. Here it is…

Stroke is the third cause of death after heart disease and cancer, and the leading cause of long term disability. Strokes can be ischemic (due to a diminution of blood supply to the brain) or hemorrhagic (bleeding into the brain). Ischemic strokes are most commonly caused by the blockage of a feeding vessel due to athersclerotic narrowing of the vessels or due to emboli. The major source of ischemic stroke is carotid artery atherosclerosis. Hemorrhagic strokes are most commonly due to the rupture of a cerebral aneurysm. Cerebral aneurysms are pathological dilatations of the arterial wall, typically located at or near arterial bifurcations in the circle of Willis. The vascular architecture of the brain is unique in the human body because the circle of Willis provides a redundant network of vessels, reflecting the important nature of a constant oxygen supply to the brain.

Our current research focuses on intracranial aneurysms. With advances in modern medical imaging techniques, unruptured aneurysms are more frequently detected. Because the prognosis of cerebral hemorrhage is still very poor, preventive treatment is frequently performed. However, the risks associated with surgical and endovascular interventions may exceed the rupture risk of the aneurysm if left untreated. Therefore, the best option would be to treat only those patients at higher risk. This requires a better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for aneurysm initiation, growth and rupture. Previous studies have identified the major factors involved in these processes: a) arterial hemodynamics (blood flows), b) arterial mechanobiology, and c) the peri-aneurysmal environment.

Our research goals are to better understand the mechanisms of aneurysm development, progression and rupture, to develop computational tools for assessing the rupture risk of individual patients, and to optimize and peronalize minimally invasive endovascular procedures to treat these patients. To this end, we are constructing patient-specific computational fluid dynamics models of brain aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography images in order to quantify the in vivo blood flow patterns and hemodynamic forces on the aneurysm walls. Using this methodology, we are developing a database of cerebral aneurysms that contains, clinical information, medical images and computational models of blood flow patterns. We are using all this information to study possible relationships between anatomical and hemodynamic characteristics and clinical events such as aneurysm rupture or the development of symptoms. In parallel, we are developing techniques to simulate blood flows after deployment of endovascular devices such as coils and stents used to treat these aneurysms. This is a challenging problem because of the complex geometry of the vessel and the devices. However, we are using a so called mesh embedding approach that greatly simplifies this problem and allows us to perform “virtual” interventions in order to predict what the effects of a given device would be for a particular patient. This would allow us to select the best treatment option for an individual. This is quite important for aneurysms that are difficult to treat with coils or by surgical clipping. In addition, we are constructing models of the circle of Willis from magnetic resonance angiography images of normal subjects in order to characterize the vascular architecture of the brain and the hemodynamic patterns in the main arteries feeding the brain. This information is important for prescribing “typical” physiologic flow conditions in the simulations when they are not available for an given patient. It is also important for understanding the role of hemodynamics in the process of aneurysm initiation, and the role of the collateral pathways provided by the circle of Willis during arterial occlusions and medical interventions.

Our research is highly multidisciplinary, it involves medical image analysis, computational geometry, computational fluid dynamics, high performance computing, computer graphics and visualization, biomechanics, cell mechanotransduction, and clinical research. For this reason we are collaborating with a number of colleagues in the US and around the world. In particular, we maintain a strong collaboration with the Neuroradiology division of Inova Fairfax Hospital, the Interventional Neuroradiology unit at UCLA (the largest site for cerebral aneurysms) and with the Computational Imaging Lab of the Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona, Spain.

Support for this research has come from the Whitaker Foundation, Philips Medical Systems and the American Heart Association.

We look forward to continuing our research in this exciting area and to make an impact on the way medicine is practiced today. Transforming medicine into a predictive science has the potential of tremendously improving patient evaluation and management, which is our ultimately objective.

JRC

Woods Hole: the heat is on

Yes….it’s even hot in Woods Hole, although the high 80’s can’t compare to what the rest of the East Coast of the US is experiencing. And by evening, with the sea breezes, it’s pretty comfortable. Nevertheless, the first annual Ed Kravitz MBL lecture last night (Eve Marder, the new President of the Society for Neuroscience) was moved from the non-airconditioned Meigs Room to Whitman Auditorium where cool is the rule.

Marder’s talk last night was devoted to a model neuronal network of approximately 30 cells that she has worked on all her career: the crustacean stomatogastic ganglion (STG). Several interesting neural dynamics themes in her talk:

First, understanding the rules that allows for compensation in the neuronal and network function between and within-individuals.

Second, how tightly tuned are the intrinsic parameters for “good enough” appropriate network behaviors.

For me, the most interesting result is how mRNA copy number of ionic channels is very closely correlated to the magnitude of the corresponding ionic currents…and how the ratio of correlated mRNA expression of two channel types varies by STG cell type.

Marder is a professor at Brandeis–she publishes often in Nature Neuroscience.

Today I am having lunch with Gary Borisy, the newly installed Director and CEO of the MBL. It’ll be interesting to compare notes with him.

Jim

Blogging pause

It’s been a busy week getting ready for Woods Hole. The new MRI is however producing functional BOLD images, as advertised, so thanks to the Siemens engineers and our own folks including new MR tech Marcy Moe for their efforts. Next week’s Woods Hole activities include a workshop on hippocampus and a talk by Jeff Lichtman on Connectomics. We’ll also have the annual MBL Corporation meeting, which I’m very much looking forward to.

But before we can get to those enjoyable activities, there’s first the small matter of driving up the I95 corridor with two dogs, my wife Robin, and hopefully enough sandwiches and snacks to avoid the hated New Jersey Turnpike rest areas.

Jim

Returning to Woods Hole

Next week, I’ll have returned to Woods Hole to begin two weeks of summer residency at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL). As with last year, I’ll be there in my role as editor of The Biological Bulletin, although I hope to also continue to build the relationship between the MBL and the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study.

MBL of course has a new director and CEO, in Gary Borisy, the discover of tubulin. I am very much looking forward to meeting him.

And of course MBL is surrounded on three sides by the Atlantic Ocean, so I’m looking forward to putting up some spectacular images of what for me is the most beautiful place to do science in the world.

Jim

Thanks for the party!

Thank you to all who put together a wonderful suprise 50th birthday party for me today. I’m particularly grateful to Ginger and Len Pomata for making it out to Krasnow for the party and to see our new Brain Imaging Center.

Jim

The neuroscience of conspiracy theory

A close friend from my undergraduate days at Amherst College and I had one of our regular lunches recently (he’s in the intelligence field) and an interesting topic came up: the notion that conspiracy theories have a specific cognitive neuroscience associated with them.

Wikipedia defines the term as follows:

A conspiracy theory attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an event (usually a political, social, or historical event) as a secret, and often deceptive, plot by a covert alliance of powerful people or organizations rather than as an overt activity or as natural occurrence.

Christopher Hitchens has referred to these theories as “the exhaust fumes of democracy”, as though they were an emergent of our political system. Although I fear that conspiracy theories are rampant also in places where there is no democracy.

What is interesting about the Wikipedia definition is that it implies a cognitive process of arranging evidence and items in such a way as to create a coherent (albeit sometimes crazy) narrative. Isn’t this what we all do all the time?

For example, as a scientist looking at the signal transduction pathways involved in sea urchin egg fertilization, I am mentally arranging evidence of PKC activation, PH changes and fertilization envelope changes into a coherent molecular narrative that is embodied by a theory that can, in fact, be tested.

What is different about conspiracy theories?

Can we test the theory that Castro or the Mafia had JFK assassinated? I think not. At least not in the sense of Popperian science.

The other question I think is whether the tendency to adopt conspiracy theories as explanation for world events is a phenotype. Are the brains of those folks functioning in unusual ways? That is something perhaps that functional brain imaging can address.

Finally, I raise the question of conspiracy theory structures (or syntax). Are there cultural differences in conspiracy theories? This perhaps is an area for anthropological research.

Jim

Good to Great

I’m reading Jim Collin’s book Good to Great and very much enjoying it. There are many very important ideas I think for an institute like Krasnow. The book itself is a study of a cohort of companies that made a step-wise transition from being very good at what they did to being great at it….in comparison to a matched cohort which did not.

Among my favorite concepts:
–it’s important to have the right people on the “bus”….more important in fact than what the vision is.

–motivational speeches are inherently a waste of time–if you have the right folks, they will be self-motivated

–put your best people on projects with the greatest opportunities, rather than on your biggest problems.

What’s nice about Collin’s book is that he didn’t come into these conclusions with some agenda. Rather the conclusions emerged from an empirical analysis of his data.

Jim

Music in Suburban Washington

Robin and I spent a delightful evening at the brand new (and spectacular) Strathmore Music Center yesterday. Giancarlo Guerrero led the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra in one of my favorites: Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1 featuring 17 year old pianist Natasha Paremski. Sure beats an I-pod! We got our tickets through the University of Michigan alumni club of Washington DC.