Tea on the Institute Mezzanine

This past Monday we moved our 3:30PM pre-seminar tea out onto the beautiful Institute mezzanine and it drew a wonderful crowd of folks who spent the time talking about complexity, neuroscience, consciousness and all the other deep questions that go with tea and cookies in the half hour before we dive into the serious business of our weekly seminar.

Harold Morowitz, the founding director of the Institute once said that everyone should spend 5% of their time on the fringe of the paradigm (at least at an institute for advanced study). Part of the way we can accomplish that is by talking science over tea with an institute colleague whose disciplinary expertise is very different from our own.

I think we’ll continue to have those teas out on the mezzanine—with the institute woods greening up by the day–it’ll be a conducive environment for science at the fringe of the paradigm.

Jim

Participation in the intellectual life of the Institute

One of the constant challenges of an institute director, particularly one who runs an institute for advanced study, is the struggle to persuade PI’s to invest in the collective intellectual life of Krasnow, as well as their own scientific program. Given the very real limitations of our time, this can seem like a zero-sum game.

It can seem very tempting indeed to decide that attending the Monday seminar is less important than finishing that grant or paper with a deadline looming. It can seem that a better allocation of labor is working on that very last replication needed to write something up, even as that decision may remove the trainee from the scientific give-and-take that only the collective can offer.

Let me make the counter-case: the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study is the intellectual home of those who work here. The PI’s and trainees who make up our faculty can decide to make that home an enriched, highly stimulating environment….or….we can all decide to be latch-key kids where we come into this beautiful environment to do our thinking and science, mostly alone, and then head home to our personal lives.

If we want to make that environment the enriched version that I mentioned above, then it takes an individual commitment from each of us in order to make it happen. If we rely on others to attend seminars, to engage our fellow faculty on issues that may not be central to our research, to telecommute at the cost of scientific argument, then what results is a true tragedy of the commons. Not only that, but we send the message to our trainees that such an impoverished environment is the way things should be.

This past Monday, Gerry Rubin, Director of the Janelia Farm Campus of HHMI, gave an exciting talk about his work at revealing the true complexity of the Drosophila neural network. But he also talked about his ideals for the “experiment” taking place at Janelia. One of the key points that struck me, was how critical collaborative intellectual exchange is to that project.

I agree with him on that.

Accordingly, I’ll be working on new ways to persuade and argue for a greater scientific “civic engagement” among our faculty.

Jim