I’ve been putting it through its paces in the life sciences. Overall, it’s quite good at hypothesis generation and being insightful in cell biology. In neuroscience, it’s got great verbiage, but it’s often dead wrong (factually). If it were a qualifying exam, I’d have to flunk it. In plant biology it’s at the level of a very smart undergraduate major.
My take on ChatGTP…
Published by jlolds
Native Angeleno, professor of Neuroscience and Public Policy at George Mason University View all posts by jlolds
Published