Over at Science Progress, a very well written skeptical response by Joronen and Oksanen to those who are advocating large-scale geo-engineering as a response to climate change. Even if it’s a Plan B. My problem with the skeptics is this: given the high stakes, it seems better to have a Plan B than not. I have yet to hear of an alternative Plan B for run-away global warming.
Perhaps loyal readers can better inform me?
Jim